Search for: "BMG MUSIC "
Results 721 - 740
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2007, 12:04 pm
Jobs' technique seems to be to treat them with quotation marks, using scare quotes to make his sometimes not so subtle point, as he does here: Since Apple does not own or control any music itself, it must license the rights to distribute music from others, primarily the "big four" music companies: Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:16 am
The only reason DRM exists, is because the big four (EMI, Warner, Sony-BMG and Universal) won't distribute their music catalogues online without it. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 5:53 am
As if suing thousands of music fans isn't bad enough, now the RIAA wants to conscript ISPs into helping them streamline the shakedowns. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:52 pm
John Markoff, The New York Times, Jobs Calls for End to Music Copy Protection: "The Universal Music Group, the Warner Music Group and Sony BMG Music Entertainment declined to comment. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:41 am
The plaintiffs who massed against this defendant -- Capitol Records, UMG Recordings, Maverick Recording Company, BMG Music, Arista Records, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, and Warner Bros. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:25 pm
Since Apple does not own or control any music itself, it must license the rights to distribute music from others, primarily the ‘big four’ music companies: Universal, Sony BMG, Warner and EMI. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:30 pm
It’s balancing what the consumer wants compared to what the labels and artists need.” The NYTimes: Jobs Calls for End to Music Copy Protection The Universal Music Group, the Warner Music Group and Sony BMG Music Entertainment declined to comment. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:40 am
Sony had sold music CD's that required the user to download some software when they attempted to copy the music to their hard drive. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
Demassi (Houston,TX)BMG v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:00 pm
The FTC Press Release, Sony BMG Settles FTC Charges, also includes links to the documents in the complaint and the settlement — In the Matter of Sony BMG Music Entertainment, a general partnership. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 10:05 am
Sony BMG Music agreed it violated federal law by not telling consumers CDs sold by the company contained digital rights management software that monitored user listening habits to send them marketing messages. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:15 am
Jon Newton at p2pnet.net reports that Judge Konrad von Finckenstein, the excellent Canadian judge who wrote the lower court decision in BMG v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
On the plaintiff's end, the owners of the underlying copyrights in the musical compositions are not involved in the case; neither are many smaller record companies. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
In a California "John Doe" case, BMG v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
., BMG Music, Capitol Records Inc. and others music companies accuse XM of infringment. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:29 am
Sony sent me an e-mail this morning: I am an attorney at SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT (”SONY BMG”), and it has come to our attention that the link on oneCLE’s website found at http://contracts.onecle.com/ckx/american-idol.lic.2005.11.28.shtml contains a highly confidential contract between Sony BMG’s UK affiliate and various other entities relating to the American Idol series. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 5:20 pm
I think it may be fueled by comment/referral spam) 8) Downloading Music Isn't Fair Use--BMG v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 5:04 am
Sony BMG Music Entertainment will pay $1.5 million and kick in thousands more in customer refunds to settle lawsuits brought by California and Texas over music CDs that installed a hidden antipiracy program on consumers' computers. [read post]
23 Nov 2006, 12:12 pm
This exemption was based largely on Sony BMG Music Entertainment’s use of a copy-protection system that increased the vulnerability of consumers’ computers to hacking. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 5:24 pm
Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court ruled that the accusations did not have adequate legal support.The seven companies were:Universal Music Hong Kong Limited;Go East Entertainment;Warner Music Hong Kong Limited;Sony BMG Music Entertainment (Hong Kong) Limited;EMI Group Hong Kong Limited;Cinepoly Music and Gold Label Entertainment.The music companies, represented by the International Federation of Phonographic Industry (IFPI), accused… [read post]
