Search for: "BUFFALO v. BUFFALO" Results 721 - 740 of 1,285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2014, 3:39 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This Criminal Court has long recognized the considerable authority of municipalities to implement zoning plans and programs to meet the increasing encroachments of urbanization on the quality of their residents' lives as held in similar cases of Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch and Matter of Harbison v City of Buffalo. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:34 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Vancouver attorney Ashley Bozek of McCarthy Tetrault on the firm’s blog, Lay of the Land Five Questions and Answers About the Second Circuit’s SEC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Louis Post-Dispatch story about the Purina v. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The principal authority on which movants relied was the decision of the New York Court of Appeals in Mahoney-Buntzman v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:36 am by Patrick Goold
Rub, Rebalancing Copyright Exhaustion, Emory Law Journal (forthcoming, 2015)In 2013, in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:42 am by Rick Hills
In particular, local agencies should not be subject to the same strict non-delegation doctrine by which state agencies are arguably constrained under Boreali v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:24 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Anthony O'Rourke (State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, SUNY Buffalo Law School) has posted Extrajudicial Detentions and the Speedy Trial Right: Reflections on United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm by Guest Blogger
This issue could have been solved by viewing Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
Dispatch, the Waco Tribune-Herald, The (Louisville) Courier-Journal, and The Buffalo News. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:48 am by Jon Hyman
— from HR Daily Advisor Buffalo Jills Boo Bosses but Lawsuit Raises Question: Are NFL Cheerleaders “Employees” Protected by Minimum Wage Laws? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:37 pm by Casey Johnston
The Federal Communications Commission interpreted texts as a type of call in the 2009 suit Satterfield v. [read post]