Search for: "Bank v. Cooper" Results 721 - 740 of 1,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2013, 10:58 am by Rohit De
Cooper enters the annals of Indian legal history as the main petitioner in the Bank Nationalisation cases (R.C Cooper v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:13 pm by Jon Sands
Nor could he show cause and prejudice to excuse the default pursuant to Banks v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  By construing narrowly terms like "citizen" in Article IV, section 2 and "commerce" in Article I, section 8, key decisions from the Taney and Waite Courts like Bank of Augusta v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:55 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Plaintiff conceded at trial that she had the use of defendant's bank account and credit cards. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
” This Reuters story demonstrates constructive results from public-private cooperation: Microsoft and Europol worked together to defeat a computer virus that is believed to have helped steal over $500M from bank accounts in the last year and a half. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:08 pm
A recent example of such litigation appeared in the case Herskovitz v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
Media law consultant and journalist David Banks provides some context for the debate in a piece for Media Guardian. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
” After RBS, the second and third largest FSA fines, which were assessed against UBS AG and Barclays Bank plc (at £160 million, and £59.5 million, respectively) in 2012, also related to the LIBOR scandal. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:48 am by Susan Brenner
Wang `oversaw memberships for the Websites and collected payments directly or indirectly through associates who established accounts at banks in China, at Wang's behest. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:28 am by Jason Kilborn
In the big case that started the latest round of hoopla, AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
“None of this evidence was rejected in the judgment and Miss Cooper [for Brent] complained that no reasons were given for preferring Christopher’s largely uncorroborated testimony”. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
“None of this evidence was rejected in the judgment and Miss Cooper [for Brent] complained that no reasons were given for preferring Christopher’s largely uncorroborated testimony”. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
Spoliation In February 2013, a federal court in Ohio granted the EEOC’s motion for Rule 37 sanctions against JP Morgan, finding that the bank purged data relevant to claims that it discriminated against a class of female mortgage consultants by directing lucrative phone calls to male employees (EEOC v JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA 2013). [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:07 pm
In her decision, Madam Justice Ballance also considered one of the leading English authorities on the affect of delusions on capacity,  Banks v. [read post]