Search for: "Banning Company v. California"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
The granted case is CSX v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
Non-Enforcement Matters Helpful Guidance for Investment Advisers on California Lobbyist Law A number of questions have arisen around the implementation of California’s new law requiring placement agents to register as lobbyists pursuant to the California Political Reform Act. [read post]
17 May 2013, 11:41 am
And speaking of arbitration, we found out that on Wednesday, a federal judge in the Northern District of California (Michelle Lou v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court’s willingness to take up the Defense of Marriage Act (which nullifies gay and lesbian marriages for all purposes of federal law) and California’s Proposition 8 (a constitutional ban on marriage equality) this March. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
In the case of H v Eason Area School District (12 April 2011) a federal judge prevented a Pennsylvania school district from enforcing its ban on “I ? [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm
The California Supreme Court in Pioneer Electronics v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
White of the Northern District of California agreed with five title insurance companies and their affiliates that the Supreme Court's ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:15 am
s liability insurance company was declared insolvent, rather than at the date of the accident. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: President signs PRO IP Bill into law (The Counterfeit Blog) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Techdirt) (Out-Law) (Counterfeit Chic) (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Law360) (US Intellectual Property Law & Policy News) CAFC vacates ITC ban on importing Qualcomm chips: Kyocera v International Trade Commission (Ars… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
The Act grants the USOC exclusive rights to the word “Olympic” in almost any commercial setting.[7] In 1987, the United States Supreme Court enjoined a California-based athletics company from using the word “Olympics” finding that the Act went beyond normal trademark protections. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Harris 13-1313Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome, USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries - in this case, foie gras - based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California's borders. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Greece The Hellenic Data Protection Authority fined Clearview AI €20 million for EU GDPR violations, and banned the facial recognition company from collecting and processing Greeks’ personal data, TechCrunch reports. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Facebook Bans Hate Speech but Still Makes Money from White Supremacists MSN – Naomi Nix (Washington Post) | Published: 8/10/2022 Facebook has long banned content referencing white nationalism. [read post]
