Search for: "Bible v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 16 March 2015 HHJ Parkes QC handed down judgment in the case of Otuo v Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Britain ([2015] EWHC 509 (QB)). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:35 pm by Richard Hunt
Early last month the Department of Justice filed a “Statement of Interest” in Migyanko v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products, Inc.… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Federation of German Consumer Organisation (VZBV) has filed a claim in Berlin’s state court claiming that WhatsApp “collects and stores data in part illegally and passes them on to Facebook”. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by admin
In the 1982 Supreme Court case, Plyler v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Otuo v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain [2017] EWCA Civ 136. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:49 pm by Kevin
This question has been raised in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
Whether it falls under that line of cases will depend on some further facts, as State of Oregon v Rajneeshpuram shows. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:02 am by Robert Destro
Galloway and Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:50 am by Mark Zamora
Other states' rulings and opinions:Zimmerman v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
  Oh, by the way, did I mention that father had moved out of state? [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]