Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 21,710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm by Frank Cranmer
While the text was initially billed as a papal encyclical like its predecessor, it was published as an apostolic exhortation – a papal text considered to have less authoritative weight. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 11:54 am by David Kopel
[Amicus brief in Supreme Court's Second Amendment Rahimi case] This week amicus briefs were filed in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In 1777, Iredell drafted a bill establishing the state’s new court system, including a legislatively elected three-judge Superior Court to serve as the state’s high court. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2023-2024update.html One motion for leave to file a bill of complaint was filed on 7/26/2023: Alaska v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm by Brett Natarelli
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is, the court held that where the legislature granted wide discretion to the agency, such as to “have regard to” stated factors in taking a decision, a court should go no further than ensuring that the agency, in fact, has taken account of the stated factors and “struck a reasonable equilibrium between them”. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation  to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]