Search for: "Borders v. Borders" Results 721 - 740 of 6,693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
(See the Yukon border control measures order here.) [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:08 am by Jason Rantanen
Given that there is no “digital border,” this also raises questions regarding when information has entered the country and links up to issues from Suprema, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:17 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
On appeal from [2011] EWCA Civ 681 The case concerned the UK Border Agency’s list of skilled occupations contained in the Occupation Codes of Practice and whether it was part of the Immigration Rules, as the Codes in which the list was set out has not been laid before Parliament under the Immigration Act 1971, s 3(2). [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 1:55 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Millipede)
Longi and Hanwha have fought several (preliminary) court cases, which eventually resulted in a (cross-border) injunction. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:24 pm by Amy Howe
The justices sent the case, Arizona v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 10:44 am by Steve Kalar
   (A shame that they forget to add the button that preserves exculpatoryevidence).United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
  No one.Francisco Chay Ixcot ("Chay") hops over the border in San Ysidro in 1989 and is immediately busted by the INS. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:51 am by Immigration Prof
This morning, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General of the United States to file a brief in Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am by INFORRM
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
The contributions to this on-line symposium on S.B. 1070 and Arizona v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:47 am by Amanda Sanders
The Supreme Court in the UK has given its decision in the conjoined cases of Essop v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, concerning indirect discrimination. [read post]