Search for: "Bounds v. Smith"
Results 721 - 740
of 807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2009, 1:02 pm
It's bound to let a lot of attention. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
They argued (and the claimants agreed) that the district court was bound by the Seventh Circuit's decision in Jones v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
Smith was shot twice and Rosenthal 16 times. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Smith emphasized his choice of a running royalty over a lump-sum payment. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 11:46 pm
See CIAS, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Lynn, MA; Peter Smith, President) Bain Cor, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
District Judge Denny Chin has ruled in Stern v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 2:36 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
Marshall v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:52 am
It's an ineffective assistance of counsel case, so it's quite fact-bound. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 4:33 am
Smith Water Prods. 2009 NY Slip Op 05911 ;Decided on July 21, 2009 ;Appellate Division, First Department "stipulations of settlement are judicially favored and should not be lightly cast aside (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]; Matter of Kanter, 209 AD2d 365 [1994]). [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:40 am
Smith, 317 F. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
(See Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
Smith [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Superior Court Judge Edward Torack should have alerted the husband's attorney that he and William Smith's professional relationship had resulted in litigation over the judge's departure from the firm 11 years earlier, and Smith should have alerted the court and opposing counsel that he could not give assurance that his client would not seek the judge's recusal, the Appellate Division held in Chandok v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 1:03 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Smith: Smith had lost his first appeal, then in Son of State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
Judge Milan Smith has a fairly good quote in this regard that's both accurate and worth repeating: "Even at a time when the largest law firms in the United States were composed of not many more than one hundred lawyers, Judge Friendly observed that we live in an 'age of increased specialization and high mobility of the bar.' Spanos v. [read post]
