Search for: "Brand v. Brand"
Results 721 - 740
of 9,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2017, 9:21 am
In United Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
AVP asserts that JKH Enterprises did not "consider fully" the decision in Interstate Brands v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:00 pm
” Thomas V. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 12:14 pm
On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:41 pm
In light of President Obama’s specific comments that Kagan “chose” to take on Citizens United v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:44 am
Recently, in a case entitled Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
(citing Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
Details and registration here.Universities & Commercialisation: Implications of the Oxford CaseThe UCL Institute of Brand and Innovation Law are hosting a full-day conference about Oxford University Innovation v Oxford Nanoimaging, a landmark decision of the High Court in December 2022 that focussed attention on important issues for the university sector. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 3:48 am
—would have the same ability to change their labels as brand companies. [read post]
6 May 2009, 9:12 pm
" If the USPTO thinks your brand is geographically misdescriptive, you won't be able to register it. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:46 pm
Brand v Berki The well-known case of Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 CH 269 means that injunctions are not granted in libel cases where the defendant says they will justify the allegation at trial unless it is clear that the defence will not succeed. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
In Salon Fad, et al v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
To do this, they need to build the brand. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:04 am
Dynatemp Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 7:45 am
Disclaimer: not one of the uniformsat the centre of the caseThe US copyright decision everybody was waiting for is finally out.In Star Athletica v Varsity Brands the US Supreme Court has just ruled that cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection ['copyrightable', to use the US copyright jargon].The lawThe US Copyright Act, §101 states that “pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features” of the “design of a useful article”… [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:08 am
In 2011, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:19 am
Here's the opinion in PDF format: Decision - wyeth v. weeks (supreme court of alabama) from mzamoralaw [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 11:15 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 am
Impulse Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
