Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 11:36 pm
* Cripps v Vakras – $450,000 ($100,000 aggravated damages) * Pedavoli v Fairfax Media – $350,000 – hard copy and online * Polias v Ryall – $340,000 (Facebook and gossip) * North Coast Children’s Home Inc v Martin – $250,000 * Tassone v Kirkham – $176,408.81 * Fisher v Channel Seven Sydney – $125,000 (Today Tonight) * Visscher… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
The Post shares details on how Britain is remembering the terror attack. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
As Jeremy recounts, it deals with genuine use, acquired distinctiveness, infringement, passing-off, and many, many sofas.* Ukunono, The Battle of the Ukulele Orchestras Plays its Last TuneJani introduces himself with The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) [2015] EWHC 1772, another trade mark decision regarding “The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain” soundly opposing The… [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
The case of The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Anor (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) [2015] EWHC 1772, decided just a mere two days ago, concerned a UK-based ukulele orchestra, The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain (UOGB), who have, since the mid 1980s, garnered some fame due to their unconventional and humorous takes on rock songs through the musical offerings of the ukulele and unusual garb in doing so. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm
On 26 June 2015, Sir David Eady gave judgment in the case of Otuo v Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain ([2015] EWHC 1839 (QB)). [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
Circuit’s decision in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:26 am
Sharland v Sharland; Gohil v Gohil, heard 8-10 June 2015. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
On Thursday 18 June 2015 there was yet another application in the case of Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Britain which was heard by Sir David Eady. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
On 9 June 2015 there was a PTR in the case of Starr v Ward before Nicol J. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:16 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
” [Flint River Steamboat Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:18 am
[See Bright v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
The Guardian published the leaked letter from Javid to Prime Minister David Cameron, which took issue with paragraph 111 in “Extremist Strategy ‘A Stronger Britain’”. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:50 pm
Enter the entertaining case of Williamson v Khan. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:39 am
The only alternative, a mass exodus out of London, already happening for many homelessness clients who can’t afford to rent there any more, despite the decision of Nzolomesa v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
