Search for: "C. GRANT"
Results 721 - 740
of 26,716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
On March 1, 2024, Judge Liles C. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 2:57 pm
On March 1, 2024, Judge Liles C. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm
Then the court affirmed that Tunisian nationals enjoy a “privilege of jurisdiction”, and this “means that Tunisian defendants should be subject to their national courts, even if they are domiciled abroad, since the purpose of granting jurisdiction to Tunisian courts in this category of disputes is to ensure better protection of their interests”. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
§ 1512(c)(2) indeed covers the sort of riotous acts undertaken on January 6, an issue that will be heard by the Supreme Court in its April argument sitting. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:34 am
As a result, paragraph 5 of Canon C 4 now provides for the relevant archbishop, on the application of the diocesan bishop concerned, to grant a faculty for the removal of the impediment in a particular case. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:11 am
And he observes that oral argument in the TRUMP TOO SMALL case suggests that the Court may apply a different framework in the Section 2(c) context than in its Tam and Brunetti decisions. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:17 pm
(Whether withdrawal also nullifies any already-granted PTE is a separate question folks can ponder.) [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:14 pm
Jardines is the parent company of JC&C, which is Astra’s controlling shareholder. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The Court granted one protest because of inadequate corrective action following a GAO protest. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:11 am
The office said: [C]ontrary to defendants’ argument, there is a substantial risk that defendants will attempt to evade enforcement of the judgment (or make enforcement more difficult) following appeal. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Using its discretion, USCIS can grant parole on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Now, as the Stormont Executive sits once more, it is granted an opportunity to rebuild its relationship with the public and work with individual campaigners to establish a cohesive legal and political process. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:02 am
The Court referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in PepsiCo Inc v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic, C-281/10, which found that it is certainly permissible to use physical products in order to "confirm the conclusions already drawn" from the designs. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:53 pm
As the approval was granted using the accelerated approval pathway, the approval was subject to a postmarketing requirement to verify and describe the clinical benefit of the drug in a Phase 3 trial. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm
Analysis USF argued that, because the November 1997 subcontract under which it received government funding was not in place when the subject-invention was reduced to practice in April 1997, the Bayh-Dole Act’s provision granting the Government a license to the subject-invention (§ 202(c)(4)) was not triggered. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
(c), subd. (3), p. 406; see also id. at subd. (1), p. 403 [“An evaluation of data and scientific evidence to determine whether an inference of causation is appropriate requires judgment and interpretation. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince incorporated Graham’s photograph in his work Portrait of a Rastajay92, which was exhibited at Gagosian’s Madison Avenue gallery in 2014 and featured on the promotional billboard materials for the Gagosian’s exhibition.[10] Prince sold Portrait of a Rastajay92 to the Gagosian Gallery (the Gallery), and the owner of the gallery, Lawrence Gagosian, later purchased the work from the Gallery.[11] In 2015, Graham sued Prince and the Gallery for copyright infringement seeking the… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:39 am
To the extent his claims are reviewable and are based on the order on appeal, we conclude that Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss because the record establishes that the statute of limitations on plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim expired on April 1, 2018, and plaintiff did not initiate the instant action until, at minimum, September 25, 2019 (see CPLR 214[6]; Sharp v Ferrante Law Firm, 220 AD3d 587, 587-588 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:08 pm
§ l 56(c)(4) and 37 C.F.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
The court got into a colloquy with dad and then then asked whether defendant had anything further to say because it was “about ready to grant this final restraining order because of this issue over the camera. [read post]
