Search for: "C. Robinson" Results 721 - 740 of 1,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 9:46 am by Robert Oszakiewski
Those wishing to attend can register online at www.nano.gov/symposium, via e-mail to symposium@nnco.nano.gov or via snail mail at the following address: International Symposium on Assessing the Economic Impact of Nanotechnology, c/o NNCO, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Stafford II, Suite 405, Arlington, VA 22230 Anyone who would like to present 3-5 minutes of public comments at the symposium should register online. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:22 am by Robert Elliott, J.D.
"     As a second example, MSHA conducted an impact inspection Sept. 12 to 16 at Robinson Nevada Mining Co.'s Robinson Operation, a large surface copper mine located in White Pine County, Nev. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
My thanks to Darryl Robinson and Carsten Stahn for their kind words about my Article. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
Furthermore, there is also a second mechanism, the “interests of justice” test (Article 53(2)(c)). [read post]
Lord Reed’s comments on fundamental rights do, however, have a more immediate resonance in Northern Ireland, as the Robinson case had earlier established the importance of interpreting the devolution Acts in the light of the values that they embody (Robinson was concerned the interpretation of provisions on the election of the First and Deputy First Ministers: Lord Reed referred to the case at para. 153). [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:22 pm
The cellular telephone was immediately associated with Gracie's person, and pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Robinson, Detective Soronen was permitted to inspect the cellular telephone. 414 U.S. at 236. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
The court in Robinson, 414 U.S. at 234-35, made it clear a search for weapons is just as important and thorough as a search for evidence. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Finding that Dukes overturned Robinson on the propriety of a predominance test under Rule 23(b)(2), Judge Hall determined that Dukes did not overturn Robinson completely. [read post]