Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
Below, we summarize the most significant bills that met the House of Origin deadline and remain in play for California employers. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
Goliath v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 10:39 am
An Islamic religious leader has been found to be an independent contractor by a Kentucky appeals court, which affirmed a state trial court’s decision. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:30 am
California has also qualified an initiative for public vote which may result in substantial price regulation of drugs in the United States' most populous state. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
A second California lawsuit, Lee v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
United States, 345 U.S. 594, 625 (1953) and see F.T.C. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
After employee was terminated, she filed a claim against her employer that they violated Title 8, Section 11050 of the California Labor Code and wage order No. 5-2001 of the Industrial Welfare Commission for the State of California. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:23 am
According to the Northern District of California in Scandlon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:10 am
Applying the California Supreme Court decision in Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 3:04 pm
Frutarom Industries Ltd. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 11:19 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
As Apple and Google are based in California, not Arizona, the argument is apparently made by the bill's opponents that this is interstate commerce and Arizona is just trying to favor its own companies, but again, the vote on constitutionality was unanimous and in favor of this proposal.Assuming for the sake of the argument that Arizona (though it could also be any other state) passed such a statute into law, what would happen? [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 11:43 am
The high court heard oral arguments Oct. 9 in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:42 am
In the meantime California lien claimants challenging SB 863 were thrown out of the Supreme Court of the United States with a no comment "writ denied," the final grasp for straw over.On Monday, the court denied the petition for certiorari in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
There has been a lot written about what impact the Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
The certified class was a group of California inside sales associates who were employed by the defendant company. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:16 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:29 pm
Supreme Court standards for the application of state action defense to private or quasi-governmental action, as set out in California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:55 pm
Booker v Cincinnati Bengals, Case No. [read post]
