Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al." Results 721 - 740 of 3,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
One high school principal sought to use mandatory breathalyzers at his prom, but an Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruling by Justice Himel in Simon Gillies et al v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:20 pm
Kaiser Cement, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:41 am by Ellen Houston
Ries et al., the Court of Appeals reversed a defense verdict in favor of the physician finding that testimony from an expert was not scientifically reliable under Daubert v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:24 am by Nathaniel F. Hansford, LLC
OA Logistics Services, Inc. et al., the court stated that because workers’ compensation provides an exclusive remedy for workplace injuries, the suffered injury must be connected to the workplace. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:26 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Massachusetts Attorney General Sues Federal Agencies In Commonwealth of Massachusetts v Federal Housing Finance Agency et al., a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley in which she accused mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac of violating a state law meant to prevent Massachusetts residents from losing their homes to foreclosure. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:24 am by Nathaniel F. Hansford, LLC
OA Logistics Services, Inc. et al., the court stated that because workers’ compensation provides an exclusive remedy for workplace injuries, the suffered injury must be connected to the workplace. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:04 pm
 C.b Par décision du 16 décembre 2019, la Direction d’arrondissement III de l’Administration fédérale des douanes (ci-après : l’AFD ou l’autorité inférieure ; depuis le 1er janvier 2022, l’AFD est devenue l’Office fédéral de la douane et de la sécurité des frontières [OFDF]) a rejeté la requête des recourants, considérant que les conditions du… [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:55 pm
S.E. et al, a handy man was seriously injured while working for the defendant. [read post]
  Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that the surface application of “over-applied” manure was a solid waste under RCRA and that conditions at the defendant’s CAFO violated the RCRAs ban on open dumping and constituted an imminent and substantial endangerment. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Montréal (Ville); Québec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) c. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:37 am by Heather Douglas
In their paper, O’Reilly et al  show that with a population of just over 4 million men aged between 21 and 40 in Canada, the altruistic sperm donation program is not feasible. [read post]