Search for: "California v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 12,631
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Kara M. Maciel
  For the second time in a year, a United States District Court has held that claims based on California’s meal and rest period laws are preempted by federal law. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Erica Woodruff
In August 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “court”) reconsidered its order in the case of SEC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Nassiri Law
There are millions of immigrants arriving in the United States each year, and many of these people choose to come to California. [read post]
29 May 2020, 6:55 am by James Goodman
StubHub, Inc., et al., 2:17-cv-04062-SVW-SS, the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed almost all the remaining claims against StubHub and the other defendants. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 10:28 am by Gregg Fisch
  It explained that SB 1818 was enacted in response to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Doing so would let the state close, conservatively, 12 to 20 of its 112 prison units over the same period, saving hundreds of millions of dollars per year. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
 Guess when third-party liability insurance started in the United States? [read post]
California Fish and Game Commission litigation Governor Gavin Newsom’s appointment of a fifth member of the California Fish and Game Commission That Commission’s October 9, 2022 hearing, where consideration of the petition to list the western Joshua tree (WJT) as a threatened species was continued for a second time The United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposed listing of the Bay-Delta longfin smelt on October 7 First, on September 21,… [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tapscott
On April 3, the CAFC held that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the district court) erred in refusing to remand a case to California state court where removal to a district court was improper under 28 U.S.C. [read post]