Search for: "Carter v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
"the agency has issued an unambiguously final decision that puts the [individual] on notice that all administrative appeals have been exhausted" [see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:07 pm
Which might start with a critique of the manner in which Judge O'Scannlain unhelpfully begins his opinion, with a first paragraph that reads (in its entirety): "We are called upon to decide whether an alien may be removed from the United States for having been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude as determined under federal immigration law. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:38 pm by Howard Bashman
Carter Sherman of The Guardian has an article headlined “‘Cruel’: the supreme court could send one-time abortion deserts like Hawaii back in time; States in which abortion is legal but was long inaccessible have benefitted from the FDA’s expansion of a key abortion drug. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:05 am by John Jascob
By Suzanne CosgroveA state appeals court has affirmed a decision by the Iowa Insurance Division that two salesmen from Texas company Carson Energy, Inc., violated the state’s blue-sky laws. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Sarah Cleveland
”  This was the view of the Carter Administration, which supported overseas ATS jurisdiction in Filartiga v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in CSX Transportation v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 5:32 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue) and Carter v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Carter — delay of habeas case until mental competency is regained 11-930 — Ryan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
Linda Carter, another co-worker, also had financial problems at that time. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Carter (S.D.N.Y.) in this case, which came out in our favor; to briefly quote Judge Carter (though you can read more in that post): With the well-intentioned goal of providing the public with clear policies and mechanisms to facilitate reporting hate speech on social media, the New York State legislature enacted N.Y. [read post]