Search for: "Change v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 50,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 12:39 am by Lawrence Solum
The media seized upon this reported change of position. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Although the Constitution assumes that the States retain their sovereign immunity except as set forth in its provisions, it also fundamentally changed the States’ relationship with each other. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:00 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The permanent change standard is a very high hurdle, discussed and reiterated in the recent New Jersey Appellate Court’s decision of Grier v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:37 am by tracey
Regina (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 681;  [2011] WLR (D)  190 “When deciding whether to grant leave to remain in the United Kingdom to a non-EEA economic migrant it was not open to the Secretary of State to treat the certificate of sponsorship issued by the migrant’s employer as invalid in reliance on the fact that the migrant’s job fell below the relevant NVQ/SVQ level specified in a… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
Every law that changes the punishment, and inflicts a greater punishment, than the law annexed to the crime, when committed. 4th. [read post]
We have recently added New Jersey law to the app, as well as updated it to reflect changes in California law following the long awaited Brinker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
  At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
Raúl Castro Arizona’s state government is ever changing and chronicled in the evolution of the Arizona State Capitol Complex. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:17 am by Micah Cartwright
In Oklahoma, we’ve been keeping a close eye on State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and its claims handling practices, as it seems something within State Farm has changed, making litigation against it more frequent. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]