Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 8:22 am
Separately, the opinion likewise notes that, in individual cases, the standard contractual clauses likewise may not provide an answer to the problems that arise when data transfers bring EU citizens’ data within the remit of US public authorities. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:11 pm
Only individual U.S. citizens or U.S. residents can form an S corporation. [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 4:38 am
The decision makes perfect sense according to US law, but I still argue that those who claim that the picture is in the public domain are right in the US, but wrong in Europe, and the current case does not affect my European analysis. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:12 pm
It enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system” (See Joined Cases C? [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 7:23 pm
As to the first prong, the court noted that although zoning disputes make up many of the classic anti-SLAPP cases, the context for such cases has generally occurred when citizens who publically oppose development projects are sued by companies or other citizens, rather than by a government entity alleging violation of a land use ordinance. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:14 pm
So, how does DOJ analyze now [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
In Public Citizen, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:23 am
Having said that, I still don’t believe Title II of the ADA obliges cities to manage the lack of courtesy of their citizens. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
What value does the government’s speech provide, what dangers does the government’s speech threaten, and does the Constitution protect us from those dangers? [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am
We do not think that a White House meeting is an “official act” under McDonnell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:32 pm
” The First Amendment does not provide absolute protection for speech, and expressive conduct is no different. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 1:19 am
Rakesh Gupta v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am
In Baldassi & Others v. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 6:53 am
Case two, Xi Mingqiang v. the Ministry of Public Security. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:09 am
Online access to the 2010 auction was not open to the public; a potential participant must apply and satisfy both Plaintiffs. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:56 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:14 am
The Federal Circuit held in the case of Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:11 am
Specifically, under CALEA a company has no obligation to assist law enforcement where the company does not retain a copy of the decryption key, which Apple says it does not have in this case. [read post]
