Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 721 - 740 of 1,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2024, 7:00 am by Justin Hendrix
Background In late June, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Biden administration in Murthy v Missouri, a case that concerned whether the federal government violated the First Amendment rights of citizens by allegedly coordinating with social media platforms to remove disfavored speech. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
   In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:30 am by Josh Richman
“Our digital lending program is not just about lending responsibly; it’s about strengthening democracy by creating informed global citizens. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 6:33 am by Simon Lester
  Would that have been found to be a violation, or upheld under a "public morals" or other justification? [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am by Jim Sedor
Carlos Curbelo shut down his government and public affairs consulting company after he won a seat in Congress. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by Stephen Wermiel
More recently, the important campaign finance case Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am by Graham Smith
(Communication, para 4.1)It can be seen that the Communication does not stop with policing content. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 1:58 am by SHG
  Aside from a few organizations, like the ACLU or Public Citizen, dedicated to fighting the fight, large or small, to make a point, there are few who would even bother. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:09 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
” The plaintiffs contended that the state exceeded its power by conferring the police power on a private company. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 12:07 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
States (and their citizens) are of course right to want an expressive realm in which the public has access to a wide range of views. [read post]