Search for: "Cross v. Cross"
Results 721 - 740
of 21,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 7:48 am
From Doe v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 2:21 am
US v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 12:35 pm
Supreme Court; and Theodore V. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:54 pm
The Winnipeg Free Press reports on a cross-border military justice case. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:13 am
Case citation: Elliott v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:59 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:00 am
Spath concluded the hearing once again by asserting that the absence of the resigned civilian counsel from the defense team was inappropriate, and that Piette’s refusal to cross-examine witnesses was a “strategic decision” that reviewing courts would not view as ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 11:09 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:55 am
In Hi-Lex Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 4:03 pm
Tyler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
The filing cites Clapper v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 7:22 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today granted leave to appeal and cross-appeal Keays v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:59 am
Ghant (sixth amendment right to self-representation; cross-examination of victim) [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:58 am
In the recent case (Walker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:51 pm
The Court issued a per curiam opinion in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:12 am
The circuit’s precedent in Patrick v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 9:25 am
Indeed, the Supreme Court ruled in 1982 (Plyler v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 7:30 am
Holy Cross Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:33 pm
Oral Argument in case# 12-1362; Claude Harrell, Jr. v. [read post]
