Search for: "D&P COMPANY," Results 721 - 740 of 4,198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2021, 1:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They rely on their company both to indemnify them in respect of any liabilities they many incur and to buy adequate D&O insurance on their behalf. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am by Editor Charlie
  Since neither the organizations nor their respective boards were likely authorized to accept a frozen rate by strangers to that deal, the board members may have merely indicated their own company’s intention to be bound by the settlement. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
So we think that public display SDNY results are correct because D are causally responsible. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Back in 2008, Professor Michael Green wrote an interesting paper on apportionment in asbestos litigation. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Government of Canada’s consultation paper that preceded PIPEDA noted that, “[t]he challenge of the electronic age is that with each transaction we leave a data trail that can be compiled to provide a detailed record of our personal history and preferences” (Exhibit D-1 to the Ballott affidavit p 23). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Patricia Hughes
In Search of the Ethical Lawyer (2016), p.109 for a list.) [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:25 am by Florian Mueller
"I'm sure there are many companies and other entities who would agree, as would I, that there are important issues to be addressed in connection with SEPs. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
FAIR, 390 F.3d 219, 240 (3d Cir. 2004) (discussing such compelled inclusion), rev'd, 547 U.S. 47 (2006). [214] Reply Brief for Appellants, FAIR v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:22 am by Marie Nioche
The sixth article, authored by Christelle Chalas and Horatia Muir Watt deals with the international jurisdiction of courts in matters relating to the environnemental responsibility of multinational companies. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
But say the law requires H—such as a shopping mall owner, a cable system, a university, a phone company, or a shipper such as FedEx or UPS—to let certain speakers use its property. [read post]