Search for: "DEAN V. STATE"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2019, 7:06 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
My poster child: Gordon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
Failure to Vacate These rules were illustrated in Lincoln Oldsmobile, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan, New York Times v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am
NPQCarrie Garber Siegrist: New: If #taxexempt org relied on Rev Proc 2018-38 & did not identify its donors on #Form990 #ScheduleB: Penalty relief Notice 2019-47 may help w/ potential sec. 6652(c) penalties due to 7/30/19 Bullock v @IRSnews order setting aside 2018-38. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:01 am
Knox v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 3:27 pm
On July 24, 1974 a unanimous Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes in (the aptly-named) US v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:26 am
The case is Rich v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:31 am
United States, Timbs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case (Michigan v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 1:55 pm
Catherine Martin Christopher, Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As Justice Ginsburg wrote for a majority four years ago in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
In Baca v. [read post]
