Search for: "DOES 1-40" Results 721 - 740 of 11,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
After deliberations, the jurors signed a verdict in favor of Doe for $1 million in damages and found in favor of the hospital on its contribution claim against Morrison. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:43 am
It does not matter that the employer is situated outside of San Francisco. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 3:31 am
The condition in which your body does not push enough blood to your extremities is called Peripheral Arterial Disease. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:30 am
The article does not detail the underlying technology. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:01 pm by Jan Dils
But what is IU, and what does it mean for you? [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 pm
Why does the County need the Good Government Hotline? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
Language=E&Parl=40&Ses=3&Mode=1&Pub=Bill&Doc=C-9_1&File=77#16 It may be a coincidence that the technical problem is in the exact spot where there is front page controversy. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:47 am by Benjamin Wittes
This survey does not reflect the experiences of persons age 26 or older. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:51 pm
For that, we go to the relevant sections of the law banning driving under the influence in Georgia:O.C.G.A. 40-6-391 (2010)40-6-391. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 5:51 pm
For that, we go to the relevant sections of the law banning driving under the influence in Georgia:O.C.G.A. 40-6-391 (2010)40-6-391. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 4:07 pm
In addition, applicants who apply before May 1, 2009 can save an extra EU 150, because while the final registration fee (EU 850) has already been eliminated, the minimal increase in filing fees (from EU 750 to EU 900) does not take effect until May 1, 2009. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus the system of claim 1 includes aspects of schemes, rules or methods for playing games, which are per se excluded from patentability under A 52(2)(c). [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Brian Shiffrin
Nevertheless, once the officer asked if there was anything in the vehicle he "should be aware of," the encounter became a common-law inquiry under De Bour, requiring a "founded suspicion that criminal activity is afoot" (De Bour, 40 NY2d at 223; see generally Garcia, 20 NY3d at ___ n 1; People v Ponder, 43 AD3d 1398, 1399, lv denied 10 NY3d 770). [read post]