Search for: "Daniel v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 2,712
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 1:14 pm by P.J. Blount
Space Law Christopher Daniel Johnson, Policy and Law Aspects of International Cooperation in Space, SSRN DoD report recommends ending blanket satellite export ban – Flight Global Air & Space Power Journal Canada-Japan MOU Could Lead to Launch Agreements: JAXA Vice-President – Space Ref Canada House appropriators seek changes to commercial crew – Space Politics A Military and Intelligence Clash Over Spy Satellites – EARSC House Appropriators Report CJS Bill,… [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:07 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
In this case, a Complaint was issued on January 13, 2006, by Kevin Shea, Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of Agriculture to “Respondents, Daniel J. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:15 am by Daniel Richardson
  The group received the necessary permits from the state and a Resort Planned Unit Development (PUD) permit from the town. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:26 am by Adam Wagner
 For example, in Khan v Government of the United States of America, Mr Khan failed to convince the High Court that the United States justice system was inherently unfair. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
(rejecting per se inadmissibility of eyewitness expert witness opinion testimony). [9] State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks what standard should be used to determine what constitutes a “serious drug offense” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
United States District Judge, John Daniel Tinder, concluded that Wrinkles could not demonstrate prejudice because the jury was not aware of the stun belt. [read post]