Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,940
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 8:28 am
Jim also has extensive experience in representing businesses in making large property damage and similar insurance claims. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 11:59 am
In Teel v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Reg. 41328 (July 14, 2015) ("The Departments do not believe that this [dual card] practice, in of itself, would constitute a barrier to [women] accessing separate payments for contraceptive services. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Insurance -- Homeowners -- Sinkhole claims -- The statutory presumption of correctness afforded to an insurer’s internal report during the investigation process in the sinkhole statutes does not extend to later trial proceedings -- Attorney’s fees -- Insured prevailing in action against insurer -- A prevailing insured’s recovery of attorney’s fees under section 627.428, Florida Statutes, requires only an… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 8:45 am
” The article reports this response from the Justice Department: The Justice Department brushes aside the distinction, saying “the statutory label” does not matter. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 9:48 pm
"Inasmuch as an insurer is not required to pay or deny a claim until it receives verification of all relevant requested information (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.8[b][3]; Nyack Hosp. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
Timothy JostAs Texas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
With its decision in King v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
What can departments of insurance do to prevent improper uses of claims leakage goals? [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT and DOWN HOME MEDICAL, Appellees. 1st District.Dissolution of marriage -- Child custody -- Appeals -- Jurisdiction -- Trial court was without jurisdiction to vacate modification order while an appeal of that very order was pending
LOY CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
In other words, the moratorium statute does not permit an employer to whom the statute applies to provide retirees with lesser health insurance benefits than active employees'" (Matter of Altic v Board of Educ., 142 AD3d 1311, 1312, quoting Matter of Anderson v Niagara Falls City Sch. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 12:59 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:03 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, that the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion, overruling long-standing precedent in Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
Commonwealth, Department of Insurance (Koken), 889 A.2d 550 (Pa. 2005). [read post]
