Search for: "Dept of Corrections" Results 721 - 740 of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2017, 3:09 am by Scott Bomboy
“The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Peter J. Sluka
Rosiny v Schmidt, where the First Department reversed the trial court’s finding that a mandatory book value buyout provision was unconscionable (185 AD2d 727 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:35 am
Indiana Dept. of Correction (NFP), a 10-page opinion, Judge Crone writes:Case Summary. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Determining Parents' Respective Obligations Towards Cost of College, a Court Should Not Take into Account Any College Loans for Which the Student Is Responsible In Matter of Yorke v Yorke, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 1499108 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) the parties were the parents of a child who was a college student beginning in the Fall 2007 semester. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 11:40 am
Dept. of Correction, Westville Control Unit, et al (NFP) - "Appellant-plaintiff Eric D. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Tennessee Dept. of Transp., No. 07-6491 (6th Cir. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Dept. of Child Services - "However, we conclude that the trial court's findings do not support the judgment. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:51 pm
Wisconsin Dept of Health & Social Services, 859 F.2d 1523 (7th Cir. 1988) -- a decision about staffing in adult prisons that was also based on theorizing about the impact of CO gender on performance of penological functions. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Despite knowing this statement was untrue, neither Sozio nor Howard corrected Simpson at or after the meeting, or otherwise disclosed the higher Peebles/Integrated offer (id. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To start, the court considered Prospect’stheory that if defendants had detected the narrowed turnover provision andinformed Prospect of the change, Prospect would have pushed back in negotiationsto ensure that the subordination agreement included the correct turnover right,which it then could have properly enforced in the SVB Litigation (id. at 6). [read post]