Search for: "Doe's 1-1000"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Seventh Trademark Scholars Roundtable: The Construction of the Consumer in Trade Mark Law Session 1: Roles for the Consumer in Trade Mark LawWhat role does the “consumer” (whether “average” or “reasonable” or otherwise) play in trade mark law? [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
While the panel acknowledges a recent decision concluding that $1000 was too much, it’s not ready to say one-fifty is unreasonable per se. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 9:09 pm
Before it was amended a few years ago, the original school zone mandatory sentencing law prescribed the distance at 1000 feet of a designated school zone. 1000 feet - that’s 3 and 1/3 football fields, end-to-end! [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
The Fifth Circuit held that the law-of-the-case rule does not apply to patently erroneous jury instructions when the proper elements were stated in the indictment. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:54 pm
" Why is this worth 1000+ words? [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The VA interpreted the purposes language to mean that it does not have to comply with the requirement unless limiting competition is necessary to meet the goals. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
As defined in California Civil Jury Instruction 1000, the essential factual elements of a premises liability claim are: 1) The defendant owned/controlled the property; 2) The defendant negligently used or maintained the property; 3) The plaintiff suffered harm; and 4) The defendant’s negligence was a substantial factor leading to the harm. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 4:37 pm
As a result, the text does have some references which don’t make sense without context. [read post]
29 May 2015, 7:37 am
The central CPU is 4 Cores, the Adreno 330 GPU another 4, Video Out is 1 more, the Hexagon QDSP is 3, the Modem is at least 2 and most likely 4, Bluetooth is another 1 as is the USB controller and the GPS. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:54 am
How does your exemption deal with both, or does it? [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am
I’d have to commission $1000s of work to submit it. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
110(1) wouldn’t take care of the license problem, unless you want to say that 110(1) preempts the license, which would be dandy with us.Charlesworth: in some settings, 110(1) enables one to show a copyrighted work. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:05 pm
However, an MHS report in and of itself does not take the place of the parties' right to present evidence on disposition. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:05 pm
However, an MHS report in and of itself does not take the place of the parties' right to present evidence on disposition. [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:42 am
(1) Most important thing is that uses will very likely be transformative fair use. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Clearly it does not. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Does that restrict research? [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:20 am
Louis, at 1 North Taylor (on the corner of Taylor and Laclede), 63108; and in the Twin Cities of Festus / Crystal City, at 1000 Truman Blvd (Highway 61/67), 63019. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:00 am
We have two locations: in the Central West End, at 1 North Taylor, St. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
Circuit, Case No. 13-1250 & 1253 Turlock contends that the Project does not fall within FERC's licensing jurisdiction. [read post]
