Search for: "Doe Defendant Five" Results 721 - 740 of 15,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2008, 9:54 am
Perhaps the biggest shift would allow a window of five business days to respond to a request from an indigent defendant for a public defender. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 7:46 am
The submission of the application does not guarantee that the course will be approved. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:22 am
Accordingly, the defendant argues, the state's present theory of the case, formulated and argued for the first time after the verdict, does not form an adequate basis to sustain his conviction. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:22 pm
"Makes sense.But here's the thing that doesn't make sense: That we're having this whole fight over $440.California had to pay for (1) defendant's appointed appellate counsel (plus his counsel in the expungement proceeding), (2) the five lawyers on the caption in this case from the Attorney General's Office, and (3) the salaries of all the people in the Court of Appeal who worked on this matter. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:05 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
  The COA framed the issue: "whether the changes created by the [Fair Sentencing] Act apply to defendants sentenced five years before the new law took effect." [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:18 pm
Five days later plaintiff's decedent committed suicide, leaving a note saying "Please forgive me and my daughters, and you also Carmen. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
If it does not receive one, early in the week, it is expected to ask Chief Justice John G. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 10:05 am
The majority opinion begins, "Law enforcement officers in Rapid City conducted a trash pull of defendant's garbage over five months after obtaining information that led them to believe he was committing a crime. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 9:31 am by Stephen Bilkis
He can plea to two years but Andrews does not want him to do the maximum. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The state rejected the AVC on the grounds that “it does not provide restitution for Oregon consumers and because it does not provide sufficient assurances that [defendants] will not re-offend. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:40 am by randal shaheen
  The court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the basis that plaintiff’s implied claim was supported by depositions of five distributors of the nutritional products at issue, which was enough to create a jury issue. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:54 pm
Thus, the extra five years of patent protection may result in additional revenues in excess of $10 billion for Lilly. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Randall Hodgkinson
No additional district court hearing on the motion is necessary.So, nearly five years after sentencing, Ms. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:01 am by Florian Mueller
With respect to its App Store terms and policies, Apple is now arguably the most prominent antitrust defendant in the tech universe. [read post]
Thereafter, six separate lawsuits pending against the defendants in five other federal judicial districts across the country were consolidated with the Plaintiff’s action into one multi-district litigation proceeding (“MDL”). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:44 am by The Docket Navigator
Using history as a guide, [defendant] infers that [plaintiff] is repeating its strategy of maximizing infringement damages by waiting five years before bringing the present suit. . . . [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 4:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Defendant might think so 29 years from now, if he is still alive, but it probably doesn't seem like much now.The opinion does not explain why the defendant addressed the individual judge with the plural "y'all. [read post]