Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2007, 12:25 pm
Strangely, the District Court judge didn't rule on the officer's motion for a new trial and remittitur, which the First says violates FRCP 50. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 4:15 am
The fact that § 213(a) refers to both §§ 206 and 207 does not mean, as Defendant urges, that the overtime provisions of § 207 can be conflated with minimum wage principles. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 10:07 am
For example, selling 5,000 grams of powder cocaine (about a briefcase full) gets a mandatory 10-year prison sentence, but so does selling only 50 grams of crack cocaine (the weight of a candy bar). [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The DOI explained that ICWA requirements would apply to an action that may result in one of the placement outcomes, even if it ultimately does not. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
1. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 3:08 pm
Under this legal theory, the party filing suit (plaintiff) must allege that: (1) the defendant had a duty of care to the plaintiff; (2) said defendant breached this duty; (3) the defendant's breach of the duty caused the plaintiff harm; and (4) plaintiff suffered injuries. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:01 am
With this news, Constellation’s shares plunged to $47.99, a 50% drop from the Company’s Class Period high of $97.34 per share. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
Section 512(c)(1)(A) protects a service provider who: does not have “actual knowledge” of the infringing material or activity using the material;7 in the absence of such knowledge, “is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the infringing activity is apparent,”;8 or upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access, to the material.9 In addition to the knowledge-based framework above, § 512(c) states… [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 6:40 pm
17:16I-1 to -17, and that upon decedent's death, the accounts passed outside of probate by survivorship to defendant. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:26 am
Thereafter, the payor filed a motion for reconsideration of the order and decision, as well as an application to set aside same under Rule 4:50-1, each of which was denied. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:43 am
While the knife was recovered from the defendant’s backpack, the defendant stated that he possessed the knife for “for protection”. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:43 am
While the knife was recovered from the defendant’s backpack, the defendant stated that he possessed the knife for “for protection”. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
This does not not mean that one can’t still file a mesothelioma lawsuit after diagnosis with the deadly disease that was caused virtually exclusively by the Untied States government, but it does mean that the Department of Defense or any other branch of the Untied States government will probably not be a defendant. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:04 pm
The law does not intend prosecutions for words written in vanity, boast, feign, silliness or the like, nor should citizens be compelled to defend their written answers to non-essential questions propounded by beaurocratic busybodies. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
It does not mean the statement is voluntary. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
Accordingly, the novelty of the patents was thrown up for determination before the court.Section 1 (2) (a) of the Act states that an invention is new if it does not form part of the state of the art. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
The Supreme Court(1) directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff maintenance of $1,438.82 per month for 36 months, (2) awarded the plaintiff sole legal and residential custody of the parties’ two children, with certain parental access to the defendant, and (3) directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff child support of $1,774.67 per month. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:11 pm
September 30, 2008) [Slip Opn., at 1]. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 12:54 pm
Florida is pure comparative (compared to modified comparative), which means plaintiffs can (in theory) recover 1 percent of damages from a defendant even if plaintiff is 99 percent liable for the accident. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
1536(a)(2); 50 C.F.R. ? [read post]
