Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 721 - 740
of 5,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 9:27 am
The subcontractor would then report directly to the Government to ensure that the buyer does not in any way influence the statement of work. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:19 am
The subcontractor would then report directly to the Government to ensure that the buyer does not in any way influence the statement of work. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:55 am
We are of the view that a good faith interpretation of the ordinary meaning of the texts of Articles VI:1 and VI:2 of the GATT 1994 and Article 2.1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, read in their context and in light of the object and purpose of the mentioned agreements, does not exclude an interpretation that allows the concept of dumping to exist on a transaction-specific basis. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:00 am
What is its place in international law more generally, especially vis-à-vis public international law? [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 5:46 am
Sure, GATT Article VI says that injurious dumping is to be "condemned. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
State Department's position that the Declaration, which does not explicitly articulate state obligations vis a vis the rights contained therein, does not create positive governmental obligations. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 1:51 pm
It therefore does not claim that the unclear ordinance chilled protected conduct. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Moreover, it is clear that there is an already existing government in control of the Gaza Strip which is both capable and does in fact exercise exclusive governmental powers vis-à-vis the local population – the Hamas government. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
”Having said so, the Court turned to consideration of the French law, and noted how that legislation does not appear to offer a mechanism ensuring that authors are actually and individually informed. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
”Having said so, the Court turned to consideration of the French law, and noted how that legislation does not appear to offer a mechanism ensuring that authors are actually and individually informed. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:20 am
It is only a measure of the economic impact and does not evaluate the severity of that economic impact vis-a-vis frustration of distinct investment-backed expectations (DIBE). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 2:19 am
See Exhibit B at Counts I-III, V, VI (Huawei Answer, Civ. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
(Why does the Panama Convention, rather than the New York Convention, apply? [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:04 am
. **** The law does not allow anyone to be tormented in exchange for the simple opportunity to sleep indoors. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 4:19 pm
We have a shortage of primary care doctors vis a vis specialists. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:15 am
” But what, exactly, does this requirement entail? [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:57 am
Massachusetts does not have a statute such as Virginia does, which requires an ISP that receives a subpoena for a user's identity to notify the user in a timely manner. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:59 pm
Until there is more evidence of Apple being the driving force, I will give it the benefit of the doubt, though Chief District Judge Wilken obviously had to make a decision based on the facts in the record and Apple's majority contribution to Rockstar's funding is indeed a good reason to find that there are continuing obligations that Rockstar has vis-à-vis Apple. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
In other words, while the Article I question does (and, in my view, should) allow some flexibility to Congress vis-a-vis the content of international law, the Article III question takes a specific subset of international law (the laws of war) as it finds it, not to protect the rights of the litigants (which, of course, is a contested proposition to begin with in this context), but to protect the Article III courts from excessive diminution of their… [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
Pursuant to constant practice of the Federal Court a sign cannot be denied distinctive character only because the feature described is particularly original, but also it cannot be denied distinctive character just because the feature is not unexpected vis-à-vis the claimed goods. [read post]
