Search for: "Doe v. The Trump Corporation" Results 721 - 740 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
Does anyone know anything about this? [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court case most closely on point is the 1991 ruling in Masson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Court of Appeal decision prohibits Google from delivering offending search results http://t.co/wdrQeQqVhq -> Don't Bet on Neil Young Beating Donald Trump in Court Just Yet http://t.co/Jf5Ceyhgb1 -> Cloud Computing Advantage Under CASL http://t.co/VWsnzqy7CG Really? [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
The article’s emphasis on fiduciary principles derived from corporate governance suggests a “business judgment rule” analogy akin to the “honest error in judgment” principle found in some jurisdictions. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
LeadClick is held to the following legal standard: Courts have held individual defendants liable for a corporation’s conduct where they “(1) participated in the acts or had authority to control the corporate defendant and (2) knew of the acts or practices. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | Litigation-Proof Patents: Avoiding the Most Common Patent Mistakes and Patent Portfolios: Quality, Creation, and Cost reviewed | Italy and San Marino’s friendship on IP is over| Problems and imperfections in biotech patenting: realities on the ground and trying to fix the system.Never too late 31 [week ending Sunday 1 February] -- Women in IP, a MIP’s perspective | Another linking reference to the CJEU | Catarina Holtz on Disciplinary… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Instead, the best approach is a holistic approach:  basic blocking and tackling such as password protection, encryption, employee training, and strong, multi-faceted intrusion detection systems[v] really trump reliance on a “50 foot high firewall” alone. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
” The question is, does § 407(a)’s written consent trump § 1002(c)’s meeting mandate, or the other way around? [read post]