Search for: "Does 1 - 30"
Results 721 - 740
of 28,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2019, 2:04 am
Here are the highlights of the ordinance: Requires employers with 15 or more employees to provide 1 hour of paid sick leave accrual for every 30 hours worked up to 64 hours. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:27 pm
This one definitely does. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
Our sports postings at LawPundit are always among the most popular of our postings, so we crosspost some of these postings from SportPundit as a service for our football-savvy readers.NCAA College Football Scoreboard Thursday, August 30, 2007Here are the results for this, the first day of FBS and FCS subdivision play (see also Division I).Boise State 56 Weber State 7 - recapThe score here does not tell the full story. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:20 pm
The CFPB recently issued its Fall 2018 Semi-Annual Report to Congress covering the period April 1, 2018 through September 30, 2018. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 11:20 pm
Dalton does not fully delineate before the trial court the distinction between placement of the GPS and the collection of the information from the device. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:19 pm
Randolph does not apply to situations like this where co-tenants are separated to talk to them and one consents. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:52 pm
Thus, only a 4% state sales tax from April 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016 and the reduced rate of 2% from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018 will apply. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:02 am
On January 30, 2020 the Department of Defense released the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
Mar. 30, 3016), the Army Court of Criminal Appeals split 2-1 in deciding the case. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 1:31 pm
., No. 1-08-1950 (9-30-09) reversed a decision that found that the docket entry, which was inconsistent with the written order, stated plaintiffs were granted leave to refile, and thus the docket entry is express reservation of plaintiffs' right to refile and their suit not being res judicata. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
Mar. 30, 3016), the Army Court of Criminal Appeals split 2-1 in deciding the case. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 12:49 pm
For those interested using video as an entry point for discussing the issues around the activities of business that touch on human rights or the societal responsibilities of business (and perhaps the political obligations of the states that ought to manage these behaviors), with no judgment or endorsement of the politics of these suggestions except as entry point for discussion and analysis the following is offered: 5 videos from Al Jazeera “corporations on trial"; 13 min… [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 5:31 pm
However, as of June 30, there is no visual evidence of Russian units vacating the ZNPP. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 9:10 pm
It has been over 30 years since Florida lawmakers enacted section 624.155, which was designed to provide a civil remedy when an insurer fails to settle their policyholder’s claim in good faith or commits any one of the unfair claims handling practices identified in section 626.9541(1)(i). [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:20 pm
The post Does it walk and quack like a statute of limitations? [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 10:46 am
So although things may change before March 31, 2018, for now, the new EEO-1 Form is still a “go. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:21 pm
Where does the District of Hawaii, conceptually rendered above, stack up? [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 4:10 pm
The term includes a failure of a transferee of structured settlement payment rights to timely provide a true and complete disclosure statement to a payee as provided under IC 34-50-2 in connection with a direct or indirect transfer of structured settlement payment rights.Which brings us back to common-law, tortious fraud which is not required when a supplier does nothing to cure (fix) the deceptive act within 30 days of receiving notice of the consumer's injury.The consumer… [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
The good faith exception does not apply. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:25 am
Does Florida law specify an age requirement for admission into a public school first grade? [read post]