Search for: "Does 1-71"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
The court could determine that the POP’s precedential statutory interpretation does not satisfy Chevron Step Zero. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
March 1, 2016: CMS published a Proposed Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment Process. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
March 1, 2016: CMS published a Proposed Rule entitled “Medicare, Medicaid, and Children’s Health Insurance Programs; Program Integrity Enhancements to the Provider Enrollment Process. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:44 am
Of course, that does overlook that the February bar exam was the February bar exam EVERYWHERE IT WAS ADMINISTERED. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
” After being advised the 2008 project’s enclosed balconies would exceed the general plan’s allowable 6:1 floor area ratio (FAR) and thus require a variance, Millennium took no further action until submitting another project application for the site in 2011. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
The Practical Impact of Dynamex and Key Considerations if AB 71 or AB 5 Become Law given by expert Marc Jacuzzi, Esq., Simpson, Garrity, Innes, & Jacuzzi, P.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:25 am
If k is too small (e.g., k=1), it may be extremely difficult to achieve high recall. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
How does one put a price on a human life? [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
§ 71 allows alimony recipients to deduct legal fees under § 121(1) as an expense incurred to produce income. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 9:27 am
(d) Summary of Rationale: The payments to the wife met the first three requirements in § 71(b)(1). [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 11:49 am
Federal Trade Commission ordered the Indoor Tanning Association to cease false advertising claims: 1) that tanning is safe or healthy, 2) that tanning poses no danger, and 3) that tanning does not increase risk of skin cancer.... [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
There are certain exceptions, including at s.113(3)(a), which states that subsection (1) does not prevent “a claim for judicial review”. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
(d) Summary of Rationale: The payments met the first three requirements in § 71(b)(1). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 2:54 pm
§ 4B1.2, Application Note 1 (2015). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
” Rose does not require a formal medical record to recall how things went for her daughter over the next several days. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 5:11 am
1. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
(d) Summary of Rationale: The payment to the wife met the first three requirements in § 71(b)(1). [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:33 am
Increasing the VAT does a few things. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
A certification mark does not indicate origin in a single commercial or proprietary source the way a trademark or service mark does”). [read post]
