Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 721 - 740
of 40,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 3:27 pm
See Windsor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
On February 6, 2012, the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) handed down its opinion in Duran v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:06 pm
The dissent in Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:22 pm
The Court's opinion could come down before the Colorado Secretary of State declares the official winner. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
Virginia, which struck down state laws banning interracial marriages as unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
In Maxwood v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:22 pm
Detectives had hospital workers hold down Mr. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:21 am
[See coverage of another case from the November 22nd hand down list.] [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:10 pm
Another resident called police and claimed that approximately 2 months earlier she had witnessed him tearing down ceiling tiles in the dorm, which resulted in approximately $250.00 in damage. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
While the Ninth Circuit case was pending, Prager doubled down by initiating a parallel state court lawsuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
Good, handed down on Monday, is great news for friends of federalism. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
I have posted my latest piece, Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:31 am
Justice Alito delivers opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
His reasoning is now provided in the judgment handed down yesterday. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 3:23 pm
Yesterday, in Jaynes v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
On March 31, 2010 the US Supreme Court handed down a 7-2 decision in the case of Padilla v. [read post]
