Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court wrote in Davis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
Davis in denying the petitioner, Lamar Eady, a certificate of appealability based upon adverse circuit precedent, when the question of whether Florida felony battery under Fla. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Such is the case in Allen v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
In Frese v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm
Davis, New York University School of Law, Florencia Marotta-Wurgler, New York University School of Law. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:03 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
The following year the court ruled on a student’s claim of sexual harassment by another student in Davis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:22 am
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3] But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of… [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Take the case of Hutto v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
Davis, which asks whether and when a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), which sets out the procedures for a motion to alter or amend a judgment, should be treated as a second or successive petition for habeas corpus. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:54 pm
U.S.WHO:Robert Corn-Revere of Davis Wright Tremaine LLPWHEN:Friday, Sept. 20, at 9:30 amWHERE:E. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
Davis, No. 18-6943, the Court will ponder another effort to use the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to subvert the strong limitation on reopening habeas corpus cases that Congress enacted in 1996. [read post]
