Search for: "FLOWERS v. THE STATE"
Results 721 - 740
of 841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 9:18 am
The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010) - Read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliamentary Square, with the High Court stating that his response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm
Flowers, 231 S.C. 545, 551, 99 S.E.2d 391, 394 (1957)). [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:08 am
However, in a recent decision, Ted R. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am
Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist accounted for this sort of mess in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 7:59 pm
" In a concurring opinion in the Supreme Court flag-burning case (Texas v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 5:46 am
District Judge James V. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm
Juan Antunez broke the news that this is surely a season of May flowers for asset protection planning. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:32 pm
Juan Antunez broke the news that this is surely a season of May flowers for asset protection planning. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm
Three weeks ago, Stanley Fish's essay "The First Amendment and Kittens" reflected on the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:11 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:15 pm
In Armindo v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm
Weekly D815aCriminal law -- Attempted lewd and lascivious battery -- Computer pornography -- Child exploitation -- Due process -- Outrageous government conduct -- Entrapment -- Law enforcement's use of reverse sting operation coordinated by private organization whose volunteers simply entered online chat rooms and waited for someone to solicit sexual activity from a person believed to be a minor was not so outrageous that due process considerations would bar prosecution -- Volunteers did… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
See Whitlock v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
“They are the patent examiners....They are paid by the United States of America. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 5:35 pm
Altamirano presented himself as an Ecuadorian businessman eager to establish his flower, fruit, and seafood import/export business in the United States. [read post]
Strauss Charges Texas Legislature to Look at Local Ordinances Governing Surface Use in Barnett Shale
31 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm
Texas Citizens for a Safe Future and Clean Water v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:51 am
In Jones v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:58 am
Flowers , 330 U. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm
Seitz v. [read post]
