Search for: "Farmer v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 934
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am by Mike Scarcella
The United States Department of Agriculture helped research the identification of a bank. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:19 pm by Todd Janzen
An organization called the Environmental Integrity Project, as well as other citizen groups from Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), Sierra Club, and the Waterkeeper Alliance (collectively, the "petitioners"), have petitioned Lisa P. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am by Rhead Enion
 The Court recently struck a federal law that criminalized, among other things, the sale of dogfighting videos (United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm by Viking
Fay Observer reports that: Jurors in the court-martial of a Fort Bragg soldier [United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The money a country earns often stops at the capital, doesn’t go to the farmers. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am by Matthew Flinn
This is true at the time of the commission of the offence, and remains true when the offender is imprisoned, as has been recognised in the case of Hirst v United Kingdom (No. 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 41. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:34 pm by Jonathan
Monsanto has sued farmers in the United States before for patent infringment when its genetically modified plants have cross bred with other, non Monsanto crops in the area. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by WIMS
"       Charles Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) said, "President Obama is right to say our nation needs to safely and responsibly develop and produce oil and natural gas in the United States while protecting our environment, and right to say we need to develop a wide range of energy sources for the future. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided on March 14, 2011, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 6:49 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, had a case recently dealing, in part, with this issue. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by WIMS
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Gerard Magliocca
United States, which invalidated the National Industrial Recovery Act (NRA). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:54 am by Bill Raftery
Constitution provides “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. [read post]