Search for: "Fields v. People"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,983
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 5:51 am
The issue of operating a vehicle while internally possessing marijuana pursuant to the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (“MMMA”) was tackled this week by the Michigan Supreme Court in its review of People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:52 am
Corporations, like people, can be defamed in this manner. [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:41 am
In this case, People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
Satchell, 489 P.2d 1361, 1370 (Cal. 1971) overruled on other grounds by People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
People who work in particularly competitive fields or hold senior positions where they are privy to their employer’s confidential information may find that their employment contracts contain a non-solicitation or non-compete clause that limits their ability to work for a competitor employer following their termination or departure. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
People who work in particularly competitive fields or hold senior positions where they are privy to their employer’s confidential information may find that their employment contracts contain a non-solicitation or non-compete clause that limits their ability to work for a competitor employer following their termination or departure. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:03 am
State --Akande v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
Read the unpublished decision at PEOPLE v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:03 pm
Reasoning by analogy to the court’s decision in People v LeGrand, which dealt with expert testimony on eyewitness identification, defense counsel argued that the judge should at a minimum hold a Frye hearing on the admissibility of Dr. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:31 pm
IndiaTVF v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:31 am
I didn't want people in my field to say, "Oh, right. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 1:16 pm
But by delaying a lawsuit, a patent owner can make it difficult for the defendant to find evidence of what people in the field knew about or would have found obvious back when the application was filed. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:00 am
Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Unlike some of the current members of the Patents Court, Henry is no stranger to intellectual property, a field in which he has practised since the 1980s: indeed, he is a fully-fledged member of the IP community and his exploits as a Deputy Judge have been recorded on a number of occasions on this weblog (see eg Healey v Jensen here, International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller of Patents here). [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
He also referred to the outcome of the Stewards’ Enquiry the previous day and commented that “Most people watching this…would reach the same conclusion. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
Secondly, discrimination may arise where people who enjoy a relevant status are treated differently from people not sharing that status who are in a similar situation. [read post]
