Search for: "GRANT v. STATE"
Results 721 - 740
of 61,417
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 11:05 pm
Ninth Circuit court of Appeals has granted an en banc rehearing in Navajo Nation v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:13 am
From the Nov. 4, 2024 Order List : 1) Cert. granted in Riley v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 7:55 pm
In 1973, Roe v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 1:27 pm
After transferring a patent case to Delaware Judge Ward today granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's class action complaint for failure to state a claim in Oden v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 am
United States, a case filed by Walter Daniel, who is a lieutenant commander in the Coast Guard. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 pm
” That motion was granted. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:21 am
In Rivas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 11:56 pm
At trial, the judge granted Mason's motion to suppress the drugs on the basis of an unreasonable detention, which Mason had estimated at 25 minutes, and the State at 10 minutes. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 6:19 am
See Diorinou v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:02 pm
And in Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
It has been blackletter law since Patsy v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:00 pm
The Court granted review in one case on numerous issues:PD-0401-09, Ex parte Amber Lovill: The CCA granted the State's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this forgery case out of Nueces County on the following seven issues: 1. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
In Monasky v. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court granted review in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Regina (Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269; [2011] WLR (D) 95 “Where a party sought permission to appeal from a judge and permission was granted on terms, that party had no right to appeal against those terms by reason of section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999, unless the party concerned was not present at the permission hearing at which the terms were imposed. [read post]
