Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 721 - 740
of 76,029
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:50 am
When the Supreme Court suggests in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:43 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Rockey v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
”ESC later sought to dismiss those counterclaims, but the Queens County Supreme Court denied that request.On appeal, because New Ylrk law -- Labor Law § 193 – prohibited such claims, and given that those statutory protections were unwaivable, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the underlying determination and granted ESC’s request.Bet they all labored over that.# # #DECISIONC. v FLT., LLC [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:59 am
The Supreme Court has given the press added “breathing room” with the higher standard of proof found in cases such as New York Times v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:31 am
Granted, it comes on the heels of Loper Bright and Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
Nicklin J at first instance in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2019] EWHC 970 (QB)). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:37 pm
” Galbreath v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm
Applicants are advised to adhere closely to ODOD’s Economic Impact Statement guidelines for any given application round. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:31 am
If for some reason you’ve been ignoring the news, just recently in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:59 am
This rule package, like the earlier Tafas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 10:31 am
Justice Wiley seems right to me when he says that, under the statute, continuous sexual abuse of a child doesn't necessarily require an intent to sexually arose one's self, and that whatever the alleged flaws of the jury instruction given here, they don't really matter in this particular case, since the only alleged basis for defendant's digital penetration of this child was to "punish" her. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:59 am
The case before the Court, Snyder v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:42 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:33 am
Background on Chevron In Chevron v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:32 am
Here’s what you can expect from the Court’s next crop of cases.R. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
527, Decision No. 15,937; see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714 [1980]). [read post]
