Search for: "Grant v. Sullivan" Results 721 - 740 of 1,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
In this Court, the Newspaper again asserts that the trial court should have granted summary judgment because the articles at issue were substantially true. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
"Unsurprisingly the news organizations' amici brief focused solely on the dangers of prior restraints and their intersection with copyright injunctions: "indeed, prior restraints cut against the very wording and core of the First Amendment, unlike the much more indirect effect of the First Amendment on libel law"where prior restraints are almost never granted (New York Times Co. v Sullivan (1964)). [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
Winkle - "The State of Indiana brings this interlocutory appeal from the Shelby Superior Court's grant of suppression motions filed by Kevin J. [read post]
Over a century ago, this Court emphasized the point:In ordinary cases the judge has a discretion to grant a new trial whenever, in his opinion, wrong and injustice have been done by the verdict; and it is upon this ground that courts have refused to interfere to revise the granting of new trials.Goss, 17 Tex. at 115. [read post]
19 May 2014, 6:58 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted (Moncel v Sullivan’s of Indiana, Inc, May 13, 2014, Lawrence, W). [read post]