Search for: "HALL v. STATE"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
In Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall [2001] EWCA Civ 2034, and in B Osborn & Co Ltd v Dior [2003] EWCA Civ 281, both concerning the validity of notices under section 20 Housing Act 1988, it was held that the same approach applied to statutory notices, and also “they also establish that notices which contain errors or omissions that are not obvious may be “substantially to the same effect” as a prescribed form if the notices nevertheless fulfil the… [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
In Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall [2001] EWCA Civ 2034, and in B Osborn & Co Ltd v Dior [2003] EWCA Civ 281, both concerning the validity of notices under section 20 Housing Act 1988, it was held that the same approach applied to statutory notices, and also “they also establish that notices which contain errors or omissions that are not obvious may be “substantially to the same effect” as a prescribed form if the notices nevertheless fulfil the… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:43 am
Some cases do not.The case is Johnson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:40 pm
Hall, 573 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am
” Hall v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Indeed, Article 21(1) of the GDPR specifically states that the successful exercise of the right to objection must result in the controller “no longer process[ing] the personal data”. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:36 pm
Hall & Mark David Hall eds., Indianapolis, Liberty Fund 2007); see also Stinneford, supra, at 1769. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 7:15 am
March 31, noon, Georgia State University College of Law. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
Yet, that presumption lies at the foundation of our criminal justice system, requiring trial courts to instruct juries about the presumption without minimizing its importance (see CPL § 300.10[2]; People v Hall, 155 AD2d 344, 346-347 [1st Dept 1989]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm
Georgia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
In Gonzaga University v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:56 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed the lower court's ruling, citing Jennings v New York State Office of Mental Health, 786 F Supp 376.In Jennings the court opined that "[t]he gender-based assignment policy strikes a balance between the patients' privacy interests and the right of Security Hospital Treatment Assist ands [SHTA] to bid for [the] position," explaining that the requirement that at least one SHTA of the same gender as the patients be assigned… [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 3:45 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:07 am
So the jury only heard the state law claims. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:06 am
" was pretty much the chatter in the legal and lawmaking halls of our great and educated state. [read post]
