Search for: "HOBBS V. STATE" Results 721 - 740 of 764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
With the regulatory stories of 2012 coming to an end, RegBlog would like to take this opportunity to reflect back on what has been a year of significant regulatory developments in the United States and throughout the world. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
A: Calvin from Calvin & Hobbes * Q: What is copyright dilemma in 2009 movie, The Last Station? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am by Peter McCormick
  Most seriously, he totally botches the description of an extremely important recent case, Chaoulli v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There is also a comment on the case on the Schillings website by Ben Hobbs. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The course in question covered the history of Western legal thought and philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Hobbes, and Mill. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:37 am
 The post led with the 4th Circuit's decision in US v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:50 am
There must be some fairly annoyed people roaming round Alicante today following the publication in the Curia website of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling on OHIM's appeal in Case C-273/05 P, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market v Celltech R&D Ltd. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys appealed to the Appointed Person (Geoffrey Hobbs QC, whose decision of 27 May you can study here. [read post]