Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am
At the end of July, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Socha v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 7:46 pm
Hale v Ward County, 848 N.W. 2d 245 (ND 6/24/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Corp. et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The reason that Parliament was wrong was set out in the case of MacDonald v Fernandez where no less a personage than Hale LJ (as she then was) held that an s21 notice was not a notice to quit and hence that the s21 regime fell outside the common law notice to quit regime. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:50 am
Hale v Ward County, 848 N.W. 2d 245 (ND 6/24/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.ndcourts.gov/court/opinions/20110171.htm Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance Tagged: gun range [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
More from Jim Bessen. * A paper by Intel and Wilmer Hale indicates that $120 of a $400 smartphone is due to patent licensing. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Defense Attorney: Robert Hood Hale 3. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Baroness Hale gave the leading speech, with which the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
Baroness Hale in Birmingham CC v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 – a case which, imho, can be made to say what you want it to say – said at [65], “There may come a case in which we should re-examine the circumstances in which a finding of intentional homelessness ceases to colour all future decisions under the Act but there is no need for us to do so now”. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:51 am
See McCormick v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:31 am
The ECtHR Chamber has delivered its decision in McDonald v UK. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
Feels a bit like giving in, though.Anyway: Transcript of oral argument, for those who prefer not to read secondhand postmortems.Supreme Court post-argument discussion at AU's Washington College of Law: Pom Wonderful v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
(citing Hale v. [read post]
