Search for: "Hand v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 34,536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
On 29 January 2024 Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Blake & Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
It would be utterly self-funded too with the price horn commands within the existing markets, with many many thousands of dollars changing hand within this vile trade. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
With a handful of exceptions where “invasion” is used metaphorically, as when referring to an “invasion of rights,” the word invariably refers to a hostile armed incursion into or against the territory of the states or the nation, an incursion that must be met with a military response. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am by Kurt Lash
Akhil Reed Amar (Yale) and Vikram David Amar (Illinois) in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
More than a dozen years ago, Peter Mahler wrote about one such case, Barasch v Williams Real Estate Co. (33 Misc 3d 1219[A] [Sup Ct, NY County 2011]). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright On 24 January 2024, HHJ Clarke handed down judgement in the case of Thatchers Cider Company Limited v Aldi Stores Limited [2024] EWHC 88 (IPEC). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
A week from Thursday, on February 8, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 23-179, Trump v. [read post]