Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon" Results 721 - 740 of 1,482
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
Teleflex, harmonization of regulatory processes and standards, such as those relating to drug and biologics approval, adoption of international intellectual property instruments such as the WTO's Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and convergence of national science and technology (S&T) policies aimed at commercialization of publicly funded medical research. [read post]
In particular, NAGR and Bevis point to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:38 am
La Justicia, entre los juncosQue aunque neglo, gente somo ExtravagantesFiscalía instructora y Derechos fundamentales Caso “bebe Wyatt” Exigencias ético-jurídicas decisivas Harmonías jurídicas. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:07 am by Perry Herzfeld
Related posts: Article on the Dichotomy of Substance and Procedure Nova Scotia Court of Appeal on Substance-Procedure Distinction Seminar: Substance and Procedure in the Law Applicable to Torts – Harding v Wealands & the Rome II Regulation [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm by James Hamilton
Doing so will both further the general policy of treating unsecured creditors equally and help harmonize the liquidation authority with the Bankruptcy Code, under which the priorities for any unsecured claims are construed narrowly precisely because of the overall goal of treating all unsecured creditors equitably, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in Begier v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:12 am by Benjamin Fontaine (Plasseraud)
The last episode of this story is the judgment delivered by the General Court on 21 February 2024 in Case T-361/21, Papouis Dairies Ltd (and others) v the European Commission. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 4:17 am by Tomasz Targosz
• Leave a comment on Scope of copyright contracts – decision of the Supreme Court of March 24, 2011, I CSK 450/10 More from our authors: Harmonizing European Copyright Law. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:52 pm
http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/opinions/supreme/A8209ExpungementPetitionofDH.pdf State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 11:56 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The certification of origin: (1) Need not be in a prescribed format but must be in writing or must be transmitted electronically pursuant to any electronic means authorized by CBP for that purpose; (2) May be provided on an invoice or any other document, except an invoice or commercial document issued in the territory of a non-USMCA country; (3) Must be in the possession of the importer at the time the claim for preferential tariff treatment is made; (4) Must include the following… [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 10:57 pm by INFORRM
The intention of the EC is to harmonize and to strengthen the projection of journalistic sources. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
In an effort to harmonize these conflicting demands, the Court has assumed that compliance with the VRA is a compelling State interest for Fourteenth Amendment purposes, see e.g., Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 2:11 pm
In determining whether the statute is ambiguous, we consider the `canons of interpretation’ listed in Minnesota Statutes § 645.08 (2014), and interpret the statute as a whole to `harmonize and give effect to all its parts,’ presuming that the Legislature `intended the entire statute to be effective and certain. [read post]