Search for: "Hayes v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 849
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2009, 2:21 pm
The court of appeals reversed, holding that the indictment must be dismissed because it failed to allege that Hayes’ state misdemeanor battery conviction was based on an offense that has as an element a domestic relationship between the offender and the victim. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
Posts by Lyle Denniston here and here provide the basic story of Hayes, which will appear (and may be reported) to be just a technical little statutory interpretation case: The Court has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:20 am
The Court has issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:16 am
The decision in Ysursa v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
The Court ruled 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
According to ABC News, Stanford has hired Brendan V. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:46 am
S 2406 Last Act: 02/19/09 referred to governmental operationsA5730
Hayes (MS) -- Provides that the people must be ready for trial within sixty days of the commencement of a criminal action when the defendant is charged with a traffic infraction No Same asLast Act: 02/19/09 referred to codesA5732
Perry -- Relates to the rights of youth in detention and residential programs for youth No Same asLast Act: 02/19/09 referred to children and familiesA5750&am [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:31 am
S2167
PARKER -- Enacts the "Clear Your Good Name Act"; requires all state and municipal law enforcement agencies to expunge references to and records of voidable arrests Same as A 3350 BLURB : CP L. expunge voidable arrests Last Act: 02/12/09 REFERRED TO CODESLast Action Date: 02/13/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
Haidinger-Hayes, Inc. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 586, 595; Dwyer v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Chairman Liebman concurred in the denial of the motion for reconsideration for the reasons stated in footnotes 5 and 8 of the Board's Order denying the special appeals. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:10 pm
Hayes, ... 2. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 1:54 pm
Puckett v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Additionally, the state health officer (a physician) made a statement directed at consumers and retailers (restaurants, grocery stores): “I hope you will purchase irradiated chicken and ground beef as they become available. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:45 pm
Ice, which deals with Blakely's applicability to consecutive sentencing determinations, and United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:51 am
With respect to plaintiff's remaining claims, he has failed to state a cause of action for fraud, and no private right of action exists for perjury, tampering with documents, obstruction of justice, and frivolous pleadings (see [*2]Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:41 am
Here is the answer from Wikipedia: 2008, United States Supreme Court oral argument, United States v. [read post]
