Search for: "Held v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 82,095
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Bradford Kuhn
Last year, the United States Supreme Court made headlines (at least in our eminent domain world) by issuing a ruling in Knick v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:07 am
The Court also held that the collateral order doctrine did not allow the Court to review the District Court's joinder order.The decision in Price v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am by Eric Goldman
“circuits that have confronted the issue have unanimously held platforms like Facebook are not state actors….Other courts throughout the country have also declined to treat Facebook as a state actor and have upheld the company’s ability to remove content. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:10 am
The study of pro se defendants (post earlier today) reminds me of a recent Washington case where the defendant who chose to represent himself lost on appeal, forced to live with the consequences of his waiver of counsel: State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
      The district court held that the United States' condemnation extinguished California's public trust on the entire parcel, and that the 27.54 acres which are filled can be conveyed to a private party free of any trust, but that the 4.88 acres that remained tidelands at the time of the taking are now subject to a Federal public trust and may not be conveyed to a private party. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 8:14 pm by glneeley
The Supreme Court issued a new decision this week in the case of State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
The court held that, under the comity doctrine, a taxpayer's complaint of allegedly discriminatory state taxation, even when framed as a request to increase a competitor's tax burden, must proceed originally in state court. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 8:55 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
In Florida, the state high court held once and for all in the 2013 case of Washington National Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:17 pm
Held: A debtor that owes additional Maryland State taxes after a federal determination of additional income cannot discharge such debt in bankruptcy if it did not report the federal determination to the State. [read post]