Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
I predict, therefore I am copyrightable
19 Dec 2012, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Contrast Effie Film, LLC v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Weekend Roundup
24 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Purcell, New York Law School, looks back to Charles Evans Hughes's Supreme Court of the United States for inspiration on how Chief Justices can induce the resignations of Associate Justices  (The Hill).Barbara Lauriat, Texas Tech University School of Law, has published Robinson & Roberts v. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 am by Sophie Corke
GuestKat Rose Hughes explained the implications of the UK's incorporation of the SPC Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009) into domestic law for UK SPC holders, with elements of both continuity and potentially critical change. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Studies in the History of Tax Law
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
The overlooked majority: the limits of Whitney v CIRRichard Thomas (First Tier Tribunal, UK)7. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Cops, prosecutors, raise white flag, vow to fight on warrants for cell-phone location data
17 Sep 2014, 3:09 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
") And in Barfield v. [read post]
Grits for Breakfast - http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/
Inforrm is taking a Winter Break
22 Dec 2018, 3:24 am by INFORRM
  We have had 425,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
A 512(f) Plaintiff Wins at Trial!
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
As a double-insult, 512(f) preempts related state law claims over abusive takedown notices, so it actually leaves victims worse off than if 512(f) didn’t exist by clearing out the field. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Never too late: if you missed The IPKat last week
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
GuestKat Rose Hughes, in When will the appeal fee be refunded? [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Race Trials in the North Carolina Law Review
8 Sep 2013, 5:41 pm by Alfred Brophy
Jones, Hughes v. [read post]
The Faculty Lounge - http://www.thefacultylounge.org/
McKechnie for Supreme Court
28 Jun 2010, 10:19 am by Mairead Enright
Justice Hugh Geoghegan, who has retired. [read post]
Human Rights in Ireland - http://www.humanrights.ie
In the Supreme Court w/c 4 March 2019
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
The Federal Circuit’s New Reluctance to Limit Claims
7 Sep 2023, 1:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
The decision also rejected an appointments challenge under United States v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
UK Supreme Court Blog - http://ukscblog.com/
Enron still causing trouble
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
Hughes Aircraft Co. v. [read post]
North Carolina Divorce Lawyers Blog - http://www.northcarolinadivorcelawyersblog.com/
Not Cybercrime But . . .
23 Oct 2008, 8:03 am
Spanierman v. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Petitions of the week: Warrantless home searches, border-wall funding and more
2 Sep 2020, 1:48 pm by Andrew Hamm
Trump v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
LSI v. UMN: Binary Conversion, Eligibility, and “By Another”
16 Aug 2022, 10:50 am by Dennis Crouch
  LSI Corp. v. [read post]
Patently-O - https://patentlyo.com
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
The Appellate Division, Third Department notrs that "the scope of this Court's review of a condemnor's EDPL 204 determination is limited to whether (1) the proceeding was constitutionally sound; (2) the condemnor had the requisite authority; (3) its determination complied with SEQRA and EDPL Article 2; and (4) the acquisition will serve a public use"
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Hearing Report, UK Supreme Court, Lloyd v Google – Ashley Hurst and Philip Kemp
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am by INFORRM
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/