Search for: "IN RE JOHN B."
Results 721 - 740
of 3,376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 12:30 pm
Because a defendant with just (B) really wants to know. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
§ 109(b). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:15 am
Drasin to administer the Random Convergence B log and data stored online via website or application. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Recent case- IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN H. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 7, 2011 - 11 AM: In re The Government of the District of Columbia, Serial No. 77643857 [Section 2(b) refusal to register the mark shown below for clocks, cufflinks, clothing, and various other goods, on the ground that the mark is an official insignia of the District of Columbia].July 12, 2011 - 11 AM: In re Coach Services, Inc., Serial No. 77606502 [Section 2(d) refusal of the… [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 7:17 am
Judge Browning expressly rejects the reasoning adopted by federal judge John Gleeson, who ruled otherwise in an influential previous opinion. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:34 am
Welch and Amanda B. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:53 pm
Zelenak, Pamela B. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
Rules 8.1(b), (c) and (d), included in the order (which you can read here), set out the case types that could be (and could not be) handled by the new venue. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
In cases of doubt the matter must be referred to the bishop and the minister must obey his order and direction: see Canon B 38, paragraph 6. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:37 pm
Perry’s re-election campaign, ending in an exoneration trial. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:33 am
I guess that means we’re gay or something.) [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 11:49 am
John Fund v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
During the contempt proceedings, a group of MPs also named Colonel B in Parliamentary Question Time. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:48 pm
Let’s say that Jane Doe pummels John Doe (yes, women do hit men) and is charged with and found guilty of simple assault—a class B misdemeanor. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:26 am
* In The New Republic, John B. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
Doe's business associate is the sole owner of Company B. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Indeed, I would add that there's a further risk: If the Supreme Court were to invalidate the ban, that could inspire a backlash that would re-energize the currently moribund religious right, and possibly even lead to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
