Search for: "IN RE MARK K" Results 721 - 740 of 1,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 10:08 am by Steven Weber, Chuck Kapelke
The EO is not perfect, of course, but it does mark a clear move in the right direction. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
One of my personal claims to fame is that a prominent copyright stakeholder said, “what the f@@k was that? [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:11 pm
Or will we find ourselves worse off and wishing we could say, “You’re fired”? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:58 am by David Vasella
Es war vielmehr davon ausgegangen, dass die Marke ja eingetragen sei, und ausserdem habe sie sich im Verkehr durchgesetzt. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
Stem cell research under Obama (Ars Technica) US: Oxford Gene Technology settles legal action with Bioarray Solutions over patents covering use of microassays for detection of DNA sequence variations (Patent Docs) US: BPAI affirms rejection of claims to an isolated protein over prior art disclosing nucleic acid encoding the protein: Ex parte Chuang (not precedential) (Patent Docs) (Post-Grant) US: Supreme petitioned to grant certiorari in two cases important to biotech patenting: In re… [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This test case complements T 1553/06 (see the preceding post), in particular by considering whether the contents of e-mails are made publicly available by the fact that e-mails can be intercepted. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
 . occurred in a matter of seconds.Bennett, 2013 WL 1191899, at *2 (deposition citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm by Adam Levitin
Part of the legacy of Newt Gingrich and his Contract with America (can I get damages for breach?) [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:46 pm by Petrelli Previtera, LLC
The equitable distribution law in Colorado, also known as the Marital Property Act of 1987, marked a departure from the previous ‘title-based’ system. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  [The expert] testified that it was neither standard nor appropriate to look physician by physician.Id. at 30 (citation and quotation marks omitte [read post]